lunes, 3 de diciembre de 2012

The Netflix of China is invading the United States with smartphones

(CNN)When I describe Letv as the Netflix of China, Mark Li corrects me. "It's the other way around," he says. "Netflix is the Letv of the U.S."
He has a point. Letv launched its Internet video streaming service three years before Netflix (2004 versus 2007). It was producing original movies and series long before Netflix rolled out House of Cards. And in recent years, the Chinese behemoth has expanded in ways Netflix hasn't: It sells TV settop boxes and smart TVs -- devices that can help you watch all that video. "We want to control the screens too," says Li, the ex-Googler who is head of data analytics at Letv, a company with a $12 billion market cap.
What's more, the company soon will move into the United States, encroaching on Netflix. Li will lead the effort, bringing Letv's video streaming service, its original programming, its Apple-TV-like settop boxes, its smart TVs, and, now, smartphones.
Letv announced its entry into the Chinese smartphone market in April, and according to Li and his colleague JD Howard, the company plans to offer phones in the United States by year's end. "We're going to be building a big presence here," says Howard, a former executive with Chinese computer marker Lenovo, referring to the west coast of the United States.
    It's an audacious move, given the dominance of Apple and Google in the stateside smartphone market -- and the limited track record of Chinese tech companies in the United States. But as Li and Howard explain it, Letv isn't a smartphone company. It's an Internet video company. The phones are a way of delivering video.
    "What's going to be critical," Howard says, "is what you use your smartphone for."

    The new wave

    The company joins a wave of Chinese Internet companies eying the United States. E-commerce conglomerate Alibaba recently debuted on Wall Street (its market cap the day of its IPOexceeded that of Facebook, Amazon, and IBM), and it has invested in a handful of companies that operate in the United States. Search giant Baidu has an R&D center in Silicon Valley. And Tencent, another sprawling Chinese Internet company, now has a U.S. partner to offer ebooks stateside.
    So many questions hang over the American aspirations of these Chinese companies -- and Li admits as much. But he and Howard aim to enter the U.S. market with a certain blend of patience and audacity. They will respect the unique nature of the market, they say, but also offer tools no one else has offered. "There is room for innovation," Howard says, "for offering a very different experience."
    At the moment, Li and Howard say, their aims are modest. Basically, they see their phones as a way of delivering Chinese video to Chinese speakers in the United States. Then they may do much the same for people who've immigrated to the United States from other countries. "If you want to have a little taste of your home," Howard says, "you can have that." But the hope is that they can eventually reach the broader market. In addition to opening an office in Silicon Valley, Letv is setting up shop in L.A. to be close to the creators of the content its screens are made for.

    A Formidable Task

    Still, the hurdles to entering the highly competitive U.S. smartphone market are enormous. "This is probably more work than they expect," says Dan Miller, the founder of research firm Opus Research, who closely follows the market. "Supply chains. Relationships. Getting room on retail shelves. As you go down the list, it becomes such a formidable task." Offering phones based on the Android operating system, Letv could face legal action from companies like Apple and Microsoft. And U.S. consumers may be wary of using devices that connect to machines in China. Many assume that Chinese companies freely share online data with the Chinese government, and the recent demand that Western tech companies provide Chinese authorities backdoor access to their hardware and software is hardly reassuring.
    But Li says that Letv will run its online services from servers in the United States, if need be. "We will do what is necessary to make the consumers feel like their rights are being protected," he says. And he points out that the company will offer more than phones, including settop boxes and smart TVs. In China, the company has even said it will offer electric cars. People watch TV shows and movies in cars too. It's the video, Li says, that will carry the company's devices forward.
    That may or may not offer a path to success. Remember: Amazon, another stateside company that does streaming online video, recently tried and failed to crack the smartphone market (its tablets and e-readers do okay). But Letv's arrival shouldn't be discounted out of hand. The company is playing the long game. Given its success in China, it has the resources to do so. And the same could be said for more than one Chinese tech giant on the edge of the U.S. market. American consumers -- and companies -- are used to their gadgets being made in China. Chinese brands may not be far behind.

    EL MES NAVIDEÑO

    viernes, 30 de noviembre de 2012

    Cinemagram Raises $8.5M Series A Led By Menlo Ventures To Make Mobile Photo Sharing More Animated


    Darrell Etherington View Staff Page Follow me on twitter A writer focused on covering early-stage startups, especially those with a technology focus. → Learn More

    posted 51 mins ago2CommentsCinemagram, a startup founded in Montreal that’s now moving to San Francisco, today announced an $8.5 million Series A round via AllThingsD. The investment comes from Menlo Ventures, Khosla Ventures, Real Ventures and Atlas, and stands as an exception to the decidedly reserved climate for follow-on capital after a startup’s seed round. So what’s Cinemagram’s secret?

    The app is a cinemagraph generator. If you’re not familiar with the term, that’s basically a fancy GIF. The concept was popularized by Jamie Beck and Kevin Burg, fashion photographer who created the dramatic moving images which feature areas of movement in otherwise static scenes. Cinemagraph was among the first to bring this concept to mobile devices via an Instagram-style app, though the concept was also being developed by a Toronto-based studio around the same time and hit the App Store later as Flixel (which raised its first funding in July, though the amount wasn’t released). I’ve spoken with both teams, who have different visions about what users are looking for in this category of product.

    Cinemagram seems to be winning out, with its focus on in-stream animated previews, and its early-mover advantage (though rival Kinoptic actually predated both it and Flixel). The app recently claimed a rate of growth of around 100,000 new users per day according to AllThingsD, and though that has since dropped to the tens of thousands, growth remains steady. The app also shifted earlier this year from a paid to a freemium model, following the introduction of Flixel which debuted as a free app, and that has likely helped its continued adoption.

    A big part of Cinemagram’s appeal to investors, besides its similarity to previous superstar Instagram, is that it manages to be a way for users to share video-like content without the hassle involved in video. Few mobile video apps have managed to capture widespread consumer attention for very long, and for good reason: making video, even mobile ones, is a time-consuming process that involves a lot more work than snapping a photo. With Cineamagram, users get a product that is nearly as visually interesting as video, but also much easier to produce and consume – load times and bandwidth requirements are way below what you’d get with full mobile video. And refinements to the product, including frequent updates to help with image stabilization, mean that users can come on board quite easily and make their own “cines” (what Cinemagram calls its GIF-like images) quickly.

    Cinemagram’s plans for the funding reportedly involve building out its backend to handle additional scale, according to co-founder Temo Chalasani speaking to AllThingsD. In a phone interview I conducted with Chalasani, he said that the company is actively and aggressively hiring new talent as well.

    “We have some of the highest engagement in mobile social apps, and they saw what kind of a team we had and how we were able to make products and they invested in that,” Chalasani added, discussing how this round came together. “It was actually an extended, gradual process where we worked with our investors and they saw what we were capable of, rather than any one thing.”

    The company behind Cinemagram, Factyle, raised $150,000 in seed funding from Real Ventures, and raised an additional $1 million convertible note during this past summer from the same investors who participated in this round. Menlo’s Shervin Pishevar also joins the Cinemagram board as part of the funding arrangement

    martes, 27 de noviembre de 2012

    Economic Impact Of Startup Accelerators: $1.6B+ Raised, 4,800+ Jobs Created, 2,000 Startups Funded


    Rip Empson View Staff Page Follow me on twitter Rip Empson is a writer and rabble-rouser at TechCrunch. He covers startups, music, social, mobile, health, and education. You can reach him at rip[at]techcrunch[dot]com Disclosure: I own shares in a technology-focused ETF, an index fund that includes Apple, Microsoft, Intel, Oracle, Google, AT&T and Verizon, but I do not hold any individual investments in these or any other tech companies. → Learn More
    posted 2 hours ago5CommentsToday, there seem to be more business accelerators than there are startups to fill their classes and cohorts. It seems that not a week goes by without the launch of another accelerator or seed starter fund. In fact, as Peter Relan said in a recent post (riffing on Chris Dixon), accelerators have become an industry segment in their own right. He also goes so far as to surmise that — just as it is for startups — 90 percent of accelerators are likely to fail.

    Nonetheless, even if they fail, accelerators are still essential to the growth of entrepreneurial ecosystems not only because they provide a petri dish for innovation, but because they create jobs. In an article on AllThingsD today, Jed Christiansen contends that the fundamental value of seed accelerators lies in their ability to both drive economic growth and foster an entrepreneurial culture within local communities.

    Christiansen, along with being the Head of Channel Sales for Emerging Markets at Google is also the founder of Seed-DB, a database for seed accelerators and their startups, which he created in 2009 to track the up-tick of incubators and the startups they graduate. Today, the resource is tracking 134 seed accelerators in 33 countries.

    Most notable, however, is the data that Christiansen has gleaned from Seed-DB on the impact of seed accelerator programs, starting with the fact that accelerators have funded over 2,000 startups, which have raised a total of $1.6 billion in funding. The founder, in turn, estimates that about 100 of these startups have already been sold for a total of approximately $1 billion and, perhaps most importantly, startups that have graduated from seed accelerators have created over 4,800 jobs.

    Of course, Seed-DB’s data is to be taken with a grain of salt. The resource is incomplete, has compiled data on a fraction of startup exits (as many don’t report acquisition price) and it relies on startups and others to self-report (alongside the data it pulls from CrunchBase). However, Christiansen estimates that, were all accelerators to self-report, the total number of jobs created would in fact be closer to 7,000.

    Startups, small businesses and accelerators are critical pistons in the engine of job creation; there are a few who would argue with that. However, research from the Kauffman Foundation puts into perspective just how important they are. It suggests that, between 1980 and 2005, all net job growth emanated from companies fewer than five-years-old. When it comes to how to best reverse an economic downturn, about the only thing you might find politicians agreeing on is the importance of supporting small businesses.

    Not to say SMBs are the panacea, but they do play a critical role. For accelerators, it doesn’t matter whether or not all of their startups raise big rounds of venture capital, it matters how well their graduates can build a network of support for their peers and for future companies. The deeper and more robust it becomes, the more success startups find and the more jobs they collectively create.

    Giving accelerators their due, Christiansen concludes: “From just one accelerator in 2005, to a handful in 2007, to over 130 around the world today, seed accelerators — and the jobs they create — are a positive change in the economic infrastructure of the technology industry.”

    Tags: accelerators, incubators, funding, seed fund

    « previous story

    Churn: The Problem Of The New Tech Journalism

    jueves, 22 de marzo de 2012

    Windows Phone Marketplace Tops 70,000 Apps


    Windows Phone has been picking up steam lately, launching the platform in China just yesterday and making headway as one of Nokia’s primary partners.

    But when it comes to buying Windows Phone, the big hesitation for just about everyone is apps. Both the Android Market and the App Store have surpassed half a million apps each, but today Microsoft has an exciting (albeit smaller) bit of good news to share.

    The Windows Phone Marketplace has topped 70,000 apps



    Anthony Ha

    posted yesterdayFacebook’s Paul Adams To Marketers: If You Want Bigger Ads, You’re Doing It Wrong

    Paul Adams has given talks before about how Facebook is transforming traditional marketing — after all, he’s the social network’s global brand experience manager. However, he took a more provocative approach today at Federated Media’s Signal conference, where he told the marketers in attendance that they don’t understand Facebook.
    He admitted the feeling is mutual. Marketers complain that Facebook doesn’t understand their needs, while Facebook complains that marketers don’t understand what works. Luckily, Adams wasn’t just complaining. He had specific thoughts on what marketers are getting wrong, and how they can do better. For one thing, he said that marketers who think Facebook needs to expand its offering to include things like larger units and pre-roll ads are “misunderstanding how our platform works.” → Read More